No. 21-7280
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review court-of-special-appeals criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-sufficiency jail-call-evidence standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland err in ruling that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to sustain a conviction?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; . 1) Did the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland err in ruling that the evidence —_ "adduced at trial was sufficient to sustain a conviction? 2) Did the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland err in ruling the admittance of : contents of two different jail calls the Appellant had following his arrest was ; proper? ; . : | | |
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2022-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Maryland
Carrie J. Williams — Respondent
Sammie Carroll
Sammie Carroll — Petitioner