No. 21-7304

Wilfredo Torres v. New York City Police Department, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-08
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct presidential-power standing torture-allegations warrantless-search warrantless-surveillance
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether United States Judge Ronnie Abrams and United States Magistrate-Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox violated rules of ethics and my right to due process of law

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented: Whether United States Judge Ronnie Abrams and United States Magistrate-Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox violated rules of ethics and my right to due process of law when they capriciously dismissed lawsuits 16CV2362 and 16CV3437 about warrantless raids of my apartment to kill me, kidnapping, and torture which had been ordered by the then President of the United States Barack Obama as part of the Deep domestic assassinations program. = 3 = Related Cases: W. Torres vs City of New York, et al. 16CV2362 (RA)(KNF) Dismissed on April 21, 2021 Appeal 21-1313 denied on December 21-2021 Present SCOTUS certiorari application W. Torres vs NYC Health & Hospitals, et al. 16CV3437 (RA)(KNF) Dismissed on April 21, 2021 Appeal 21-1314 denied on December 21, 2021 Present SCOTUS certiorari application W. Torres vs The Blackstone Group, et al. 18CV6343 (RA)(KNF) Dismissed on September 4, 2019 Appeal 19-3202 denied on January 21, 2021 SCOTUS certiorari 20-7869 denied on June 7, 2021 W. Torres vs NYC Health & Hospitals, et al. 18CV4665 (RA)(KNF) Dismissed on January 7, 2021 Appeal 21-101 denied on June 24, 2021 W. Torres vs New York Legal Assistance Group, et al. 20CV2396 (LLS) Dismissed on September 23, 2020 Appeal 20-3383 denied on March 24, 2021 SCOTUS certiorari 20-8423 denied on October 4, 2021 W. Torres vs City of New York, et al. 19CV6332 (ER)(KP) Pending W. Torres vs United States Department of Justice, et al. 21CV8427 (LTS) Dismissed on February 1, 2022 Appeal pending = 4 an

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent NYPD, et al. to respond filed.
2022-03-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2022)

Attorneys

NYPD, et al.
Devin Andrew SlackNew York City Law Department, Respondent
Wilfredo Torres
Wilfredo Torres — Petitioner