No. 21-7315
Michael Lynn Cash v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights court-decision due-process habeas-corpus judicial-procedure legal-reasoning pro-se procedural-fairness standing successive-petitions
Latest Conference:
2022-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as successive without considering the petitioner's claims on the merits
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED t. Dro Tue Tat Cer [over Or A treges ) ERR one ousiy Drsutgss Me. C81 s 32255 Axo Deny 4 CARTE Ftta nic be Ameacasrury la ‘COA “) Becarsé PI. Casxy Den Joo cont Aurnontry CHEWY : Tue Pro Se Crpents Desrevctrons ( Form (O412) Specavzcaccy Trsrtocria pe. Cosy Tar Fr bs Mor Necessary ? ( 7m Teom Crests Pro Se Fenn Fox Noreen Fag armor rer Trow Jeo Frur 4 Sewn OZ | Svccessrve... € 2255 fuse S Peer Iz Cai Syyres Suppontem, Facts (Tee Your Stoky Bererty LIMO , — «CTTING Ces by Ly ) Ne. Id, Pyce © [ Se: Abrenozy
Docket Entries
2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent