No. 21-7322
James Earl Harper v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: breach-of-agreement breach-of-contract criminal-procedure due-process government-contract government-motion incarceration plea-agreement sentencing
Latest Conference:
2022-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Government should have been bound by the provisions of the Plea Agreement as the Petitioner did not breach the provisions contained therein resulting in the Court sentencing the Petitioner to a period of incarceration based upon only those counts he plead guilty to in the Plea Agreement.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Government should have been bound by the provisions of the Plea Agreement as the Petitioner did not breach the provisions contained therein resulting in the Court sentencing the Petitioner to a period of incarceration based upon only those counts he plead guilty to in the Plea Agreement
Docket Entries
2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2022)
Attorneys
James Earl Harper
Jennifer Haynes Rose — Law Office of Jennifer Haynes Rose, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent