Michael T. Braxton v. Tonya James, Warden
Can a state deny due process by making a parole agreement on AFTER and in contrast to a vast majority of appeals courts' rulings
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i). Can o State oni) aby aloart Dur Process, by making on de pgatnr Agteem rat on AFTER ond in ContRast to o Vas Fy shake Cau of App avs Gaver 2 Q) Con w oboe nner ey Pers OE ony oNber Labs] Apos\lae Process, oMracthn a Meow bo Re hear ar Re eS shotemeat, AFTER CAGE ui ony : an "UN FAVOR ARLE * 5h Conk uicking dgcistan Cpaua o bhike Cgor a€ z WA pr aels > 3) Gana ade asin Forge “Due Praise, wie dis righ ing one's Cgnsh¥at anol “1 reer’ LNTRRST, by orbs rec i luy Conducting on Peclodele Cause and Raverbion hesin, 20) TWENTY Yéaes, HETRR SEcving 0 Parle Usolottin Warraut © | \) . Uns a Ex psst Fads Ufo Vek Son comm YER by Va state o& Souls Core \i rn 5 Vw its Ree Coa ining be Pebitteonec for Mare dime “AELRR de Reve ation of bs Parole Yen was s Nab docity Ce oiree ok ae Vang nb vurs senkfinte 2 LL,