No. 21-7332
Marlon Sisnero-Gil v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-conflict circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-reasonableness substantive-reasonableness substantive-unreasonableness supervisory-power
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petition should be granted because the Court of Appeals' decision holding that Petitioner's sentence was not substantively unreasonable conflicts with decisions of other circuits which prohibit a single-minded approach to sentencing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Petition should be granted because the Court of Appeals’ decision holding that Petitioner’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable conflicts with decisions of other circuits which prohibit a single-minded approach to sentencing? i
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Marlon Sisnero-Gil
Robin Smith — Law Office of Robin C. Smith, Esq., P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent