No. 21-7360
Marc N. Greenberg v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-proceeding due-process federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure fundamental-fairness notice-of-appeal supervised-release
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the technical requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(1)(B) trump an individual's due process rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED lL Whether the technical requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(1)(B), addressing the contents of a Notice of Appeal, trump an individual’s due process rights to fundamental fairness in a criminal proceeding. ; II. | Whether a trial court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release generally prohibiting loitering where minors are located is overly broad and not restrictive enough to be enforced, and thus violative of a defendant’s due process rights. : i
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 13, 2022)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent