No. 21-7367
Adam Shane Swindle v. S. Ma'at
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof certiorari-standard constitutional-interpretation court-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion pandemic-review record-review
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should an inmate be punished for an act they could not have known to be prohibited?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | | [ | Shovtd an inmate be Punished doc an Get they Could fot have Known +40 be | peehibited 7 Should an inmate loe punished Suc an fet they did not Committ 2 . Shout Qe inmate be posishe d based Cpon Assumptions 2 | Did the lower Courks_abuse their dseretten by net fuity Ckamininy te docks ta the | | ifecord only de denizg habeas celiel?
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent