Whether the acting Leon Vhs Corl in Cape v. United States, 556 U.S. 255, 268, 129 S.Ct. 2155, 173 L.Ed.2d 1208 (2008), trial court's robbery under 18 U.S.C. 2113(a) instructions require proof of general intent, and whether the precedent on this opinion affects the government's assertion that the indictment and trial court's instructions to include the essential time element with respect to the bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. 2113(a) affects the accused's substantial rights and seriously affected the fairness of the legal proceedings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Whether Nhe acting Leon Vhs Corl in Cape V. Unked tales, SBO US 255, 268, 210 &.CL. 2155, I47 Led. 28 208 (2008), Urol Geah ecbbery under IB USc 82dsla\ “RequiRES PRO AL eneral votent, a Agciaion What \S Orecedent oh Sh OPIN ON ass Whe coeknuient assert, , Whether Ube vndieknent and dele ct CORL'S . . ky vnsteuckions Qa to include he ecsenlial Hine Ret eleneat with Bescect Lo Ve \ any of een robbery ondek 1B USC. Szslay alects dhe accu esbitanbial richly and serioely allected the ‘aienesss ol Vhe eS al Peocetdines.