Whether the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to argue facts not in evidence during closing arguments

No question identified. : a A. Tetal Corr ewed H) By a\lous vere AHO frsSecoriwl te argue FeetS nor mM ey LAence . | B. the Prosewre evved 6). by agus fattS not (na evidence duviky Cl0S 1h Dy C. Trial Counsel prooy ded meffect ve ass Stance when counsel wo), Failed fe olpSect te he Fresecutel argumy Facts Not in evidence du hy Closing | Dd. Repellase Counsel provided ineFeectiVe ass stanle yf wren Fat ed 12). TO ~eacoe and bnieé Anat Avy TV ial Cou( + edived Shen We allowed We Presecurof +e acque Fact S$ Vox \A evidence. 13). Jo Carse and bieF Mat -+relak Course provi WL MeEFREAN2 557 Slente of crrde\ When he Gai led xe ppoeck qe the erosecu tof Hryuwrg cactS NOX LA Vv dence. Fo rs wos error Fol He united StateS cavt of Appeals Ge He FET cittuts fe not (S5Ue a (con) Clacm (@ a \ *S LIST of eAaTLES CI aw Parties appear WOME caption 66 We CaeSeom fe lovee CX AW pardieS do ast apeat Mm the Caption of the Case on the covet page. A UiS+ of all parties tye the Proceedivg Mm MMe Cort whes@ Jodgment iS fhe Subdect of Pais TS aS Collow$ 2 Piecidirg Fvdge* Ar qteals ton. Clitfod A. Seown Q-0Bor 1775 V7 sadiccal orsirick AvSha, 7H. 7S 767 on Apeeal, javid Pulyeor, Justice Third lest of Appeals Fer Texas AYST™ | TH. For {ne _Siere.”. ar weall Emily Edward § Traves Comty pestreet Attomey sRov # 24067666 ‘ Ryan eeavd Travis Guat) pr styect ATOM ey SBoT F At00SIS3 on