No. 21-7385
Juan M. Alcaraz v. Brian Williams, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit err in finding that Mr. Alcaraz did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right regarding trial counsel's statements about his gang membership?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Ninth Circuit err when Mr. Alcaraz made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as to trial counsel repeatedly telling the jury that Mr. Alcaraz was a gang member? 2. Did the Ninth Circuit err when Mr. Alcaraz made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as to trial counsel failing to object to the constitutionally improper closing arguments by the prosecution? i
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent Brian Williams, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2022-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2022)
Attorneys
Juan M. Alcaraz
Angela Helen Dows — Cory Reade Dows & Shafer, Petitioner
Angela Helen Dows — Cory Reade Dows & Shafer, Petitioner