No. 21-7389

John Peyton Alexander, II v. Mississippi

Lower Court: Mississippi
Docketed: 2022-03-16
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process federal-prisoner habeas-corpus in-forma-pauperis parole post-conviction-relief sentence-computation sentence-modification standing supreme-court-precedent unconstitutional-statute
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a financially solvent prisoner has a constitutional right to receive in forma pauperis status to file a meritorious petition for writ of certiorari

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L Dees A (? Se Prisoeer Lhe is Smaucialy ~ solvent, but who wotwithatanding dks THe Presorld hgictiAlsuppoet pyeresoAy, © produce A (merit rious) petition Is booxletfem, wevecthe k ss oualif tp erecad Is Corina pauper’ jn THis Howorable Cou t? © . Z. lubat ts THE Arnenel ert ote Due trocess Ee fr po to Ques tow of A prisoner whe, Ab lec beiug acavled 7 lea My~ valict " lemmutaten And) coduction ” of 30-chyys by Tie (Nissiesiepl Goverpor or hs otig ival /:fesev ferce , THE focally epues ts "worth notice" & tHe clucation (iw tecos oF Kes pub las or his pews commakl put peclueed, por ike Sentence 6 (This _ 18 F Question a Erstimpress ion which L4is Hono rable Court ts obaty~ Loued te clecich Ce. Predaok 2 on ne pesto) 4, i TH THE peu dis coys cod documentstion of Tie “ Seudepee Com pud a tia Recor “ of THE 2,467 Oooh Conrcluct lags which tye Moor Be cords Oth ce bac Previous /y posted Lhe Peri rioner back (8 THe Ua ~ (06h las DoH be YTen Alexpudher, I Alreachs eared 2neuah time -off. Poe good behaviac Te Warrant his Horn: peat totalce lessee Loom THe Custoly of Te MNiseisoige’ Department of Ocrections ¢ yy Due do fn eX geet Prete stak-stajk, THE Brobouckeals a woul either hemor Mississipei Execytive Ordler >. 217 per PEt tome ct 2,407 Oped Condhuct clas which THE MDC Becorls office has prwiousls posted: Thereldm, voit! His Coutr plore Coynmane! tHe REsPoveledts tp pac or tHe Cometitubiona [ out’ . l. | List oF Pagties All partes db pot , whose ° ri mes Te THe pro C2ndaq in THE Court jes mast is THE subject of THis ition is As Deas: Doh F. Aloxavcec, IL, MDot Reais op sin 4, 19 )le Capptics og] an der Ab. 3 oa, US AS Seydeced! bee ache ast a ymtionpict ; rn lk wit parole way (973 ABCW Joulw! a Pee when 1s A fictional drama tieatios & oH S ec minal Case, THE mpouie “Ro L ad a AlexAucher uv. 5 f weed hve aad Hoke, Bee Alekfucker UV. TATE, Sal So. ad 869 (Miss. A ; cepicting fictioual2 On OEE 2002), ComtAs Seoues aha) ‘ctiowal-auants Whieh nee ha wed Ouec TH be arc employers aye watched lis fe THE Soe, parle 5 i Movi2 OS THe [ke time Ch wel ; mes THAT P ctiowal-eyeats appearing ne . A , . ; Ni in E ymovie , is WA AS Prt into Sohes oficial prises rocerth. AUR (Vicsissipp, is A ot fe | / seoreh, warrdout uy stk gone prisoners pale recor ate eviclerce Qpverigg “THeiC Coyhut. (Ve. Te’ Avia ME C Hum | licled — Ficet Sh is A "ie Beco office. emokyee . be e Res gponchent in Ach imist ati & E TIT ise (Ae Ne, Emee-Z{-22) [A ol coe al pee, here aber Age. B-4). (Ms. Duce i eo |i 3 is Alco listed) ov tHe Firat Sree Reseense Le, L Mee B-4]. Ms. Kama Themes 7 Y mas 16 THE Secaudl Slee Keeloyckent [, Ae. PS). (Ne. Karen Robinson, see-tl C obinson , SOIL Caer Recols Supervisor is ; Als listed fe DE Cons c fies CS ov THe Second Slee Res Powse o¢m L Age. B-2]. LL . Bevaren Cases (ons CASLS with weit Of iw ions Ate listed) _ State of (Nissicsipe) Us. Jobe fey 7m Alerter Hinds (ovary Cvcout Couck . (0 chifica tion of THE Graud Soy | “eeclyMant enite rool fovember 24, (928. , . iasmiits~ Acguitta | . 2ko. Aree. 09-22 fh cy 1-24 Td fer Soho Rey Alexpuchee I, dh. MSH-% Hinds lourry Chancery Couct. Ducloynent brslecect Movertbe28,1975 CivilCommit ment Dee App. M-2S Bore M26 A lex auctec uv. State, B58 Soa Qf B97 ( Mise. /778) — ofirect-p goal OF THe pert ure verbict See App Q-f° Robison U. Howa tel Bros. of Snckson, Lue. B7Z So ad /o7Y , (Wes. 1979). (wil suid Alexaudec V. Black, We-3-%-000s. USD Court for “THe Souter Disrcict of Missi sige’ Duclgrmonut gulerecd May & 1992. AtouiltalWawer See Ape L-17 Allexanclec v. Stale, 647 Se. Bd 693 (Maes. 1994) — parelt-revbew ow ; Alex audec V, Sink, loo Se. Gd | (Miss, /795\ — rehearing --petition Alexauclee V. State, $2] So Qe BOI [Mies App. 2002) — TW Mov Ad ministrative Remedls Fetit ion fo. EMF 21-221 frcchacge -clale Musisor ce, DegAchmeut o& (ofrections Seo flop H-ltee, B-3 avd BY . pes . fe ‘ ill, “TABLE OF Con tents , Page Ques Tens Presested eee we hist HF Pathos... 2. 220 ee we eee

Docket Entries

2022-04-18
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi to respond filed.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2022)

Attorneys

John Peyton Alexander
John Peyton Alexander II — Petitioner
Mississippi
Ashley Lauren SulserOffice of the Mississippi Attorney General, Respondent