Are Jan 27h, 2019 actions over texts carried out by Won rebuff or harassment of Singh?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED “blessed with daughter who I will be showing ; this world to as you are daughter to your parents...” PetAppK.p87a). 1) Are Jan 27h, 2019 actions over texts carried out by Won rebuff or harassment of Singh? Commonwealth v. Michelle Carter 474 Mass. 624; Commonwealth v. Inyoung You Mass. (Appeals Court No. 2021-P-0441); Refer PetAppH.p70a-73a for Fighting words & True Threats; Schramek v. Bohren 145 Wis. 2d 695 (1988). 2) Do Washington courts have right to issue protection against a citizen from Oregon state & affirm those rights without establishing facts? 3) Was Amendment XIV, Due Process Clause & 18 U.S. Code § 2265 (b)(1) & (2) of the law followed in the court proceedings & law enforcement proceedings itself? 4) Are Singh’s defending rights violated appearing for the out of jurisdiction hearing with medical condition, wife & daughter asked to stay outside the courtroom while Won’s friend stays in the courtroom making hearsay statements? 5) Is it unconstitutional to not consider new evidence & testimony in appeal? 6) Should the precedent be on the actual causal sequence (Jan 27th, 2019 harassment by Won) ii | of events instead of judgments which are | based out of misrepresented & insufficient case facts presented by Won? ; | 7) Is it a fraud if citizen from Oregon seeks for | protection from Washington State with | protection order active against the citizen? | 8) To bolster the agenda for Chips for America | Act, should Microsoft design using Intel’s | semiconductor process after they hired so | many Intel Engineers in last 4 years? | . | | | | | iii