Does the Supremacy Clause preempt the states from creating a constitutional right of privacy that grants individuals a legitimate expectation of privacy in financial records broader than the Supreme Court's federal constitutional right of privacy

No question identified. : DOES THE SuPREMACY CLAUSE PREEMPT THE STATES FRor? CREATING A CONSTETUTIONAL RIGHT OF PRIVACY THAT GRANTS WITHIN THE STATE INNTurQUALS, LEGLTE mATE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY TN FINANCIAL RECORAS BROADER THAN THE Kmpree ly FEDERAL CONMSTLTUTIONAL RIGHT OF PREVACY BI DINE ON FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS UNDER AP USC. &8aQs4 FOR A CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BASEN ON COUNSEL'S FATLURE To RALSE A STAVE ConsTETurronal ULOLAT roy 2 | } Ne | CERISE. LE OF INTERESTED PARL ES The Ete wer sonst aa thet fhe. fllecsivg Sa complete ket of judges, allerwe S ane) paces thet —s ar + stereo in) the outcome. of this CASE as jefived by Sup. Ch. RK. 14 CLS Cah ° | wid eG a P A Wilson, Ele veath Crreuit Const ef Npsents | Rosenbaum, Elevewth Cleewtt Cael ake Npeals L AQOA, Eleventh Circuit fist of Areate Fa cklec 0 .Bakcer-, Cireut Judge Tied teeth Judica| Cite wh | Sanerce I; artes Circutt Judge Toenticth Suda Chreuit Btsew eus : kathertve. Coombs Clive. Landen P, Oiler | Tosha Cohew AHawta Aroclerso| | | IMD. TO APPEMDIX | PAGE AR ~ Priston U.S. Metiet Orang Middle Metis et ot Florida, cited as brady It vs Flo. $2) 20:4 U.Sdebs LEXIS [2I1CM.0. Flare, Tully 22, 201%) g = Pinion Cs, Ch of Rope, lertifeake of Arpeat abilihy, cited as Brantley vu In ad Fla. AG, 2020 WS, Aya. LEXIS 23855 (UM Cir. 2020) C Opiestors \"* Cir, Gh of Ap. Case Ne! 19-13 2\4-HH, cited as Brasatlew ve Fla AG, |20 Sat WS. Ap. LENS ASAA CUM Che Joa) pRte, for Pawel Rehearing, Case p.2 14-3a\4-HH I-1& E = rder Deming Rehearing, Case No.% 19-|2aI4-HH | F— Tikal Brief Appeal NM ci, Ch of Agee |-34 6 = Reply Brief Aopec| Na Cir. ch of op. |Al Reto wer is inearce netted y ind : qeat nak separated Fon the — due to comitigars of ee a making it impossible te forward the. Plbwexaccd att his es Ratti relies on the saanacil Pt appeal Siled 4 toe. Elevensth Ctreuit Court of fppeale COoSe Mu ers I9-1al4-H held by the U, S. Dretefet Cisse [idble Distetet of Florida, Fort Myers case wumber Qtle-ev0O3SH-PAM at Dockel 1, covs ishing F Echibtt | Pew A Patton g cette to Hen: | ink el with Supreme foie t Rule aq) is made From Mechel 11,