No. 21-7396

Hung M. Nguyen v. Yolo County District Attorney

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-deprivation due-process equal-protection immunity negligence policy-maker prosecutorial-immunity public-entity
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess CriminalProcedure Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Yolo County District Attorney Office as Public Entity have any liabilities or qualify for prosecutory immunity due to negligence or reckless relating to the policymaker or customs which caused the alleged The United States Constitutional deprivations under 14 amendment with Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question presented Does Yolo County District Attorney Office as Public Entity have any liabilities or qualify for prosecutory immunity due to negligence or reckless relating to the policymaker or customs which caused the alleged The United States Constitutional deprivations under 14 amendment with Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause under cited (Popovich v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, 276 F.3d 808, 81316, 817 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 812 (2002)? II.

Docket Entries

2022-05-23
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Hung M. Nguyen
Hung M. Nguyen — Petitioner
Hung M. Nguyen — Petitioner