whether-the-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-fifth-circuit-has-decided-an-important-federal-question-in-a-way-that-conflicts-with-relevant-decisions-of-the-supreme-court

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of the Supreme Court and also misapplied jurisprudence when it concluded that no resolution to Petitioner's case was needed and dismissed all motions to the case without a hearing, and where equal rights are not secured, there is a deprivation of rights and it is a violation of the law (United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)). Though Petitioner filed a Civil Rights complaint in the United States District Court empowered by honorable Judge Kristi H. Johnson, can the Court pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983 vindicate his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution to unseal an Agency’s Order that contains prevailing evidence? 2. Whether the lower tribunal misapplied jurisprudence by concluding that acquiring or unsealing administrative decisions was not a decision of her Court to ; further the case as a matter of right, a question to be posed here is whether or not the State is entitled to the strongest legitimate view of the evidence and to all reasonable and legitimate inferences that may be drawn therefrom most favorable to the Petitioner's claim? Trent v. Wade, 776 F.3d 368, 376 (5th Cir. 2015). 3. The Petitioner suffered illegal incarceration and loss of financial prosperity for no valid reason under the law. If the Agency’s Order is opened as a matter of record for this case, will it reveal civil rights violations against Petitioner under Ti| tle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964? : , Il. PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING The parties to this proceeding are Petitioner, Mario Derrell J ones, an individual, and Respondents, Great Southern National Bank; Raymond Jail; Jackson Police Department; Cassandra Kauerz; Stephen Hatchett, District Attorney; Lieutenant | Bobby Queen; Officer Fred Sullivan; Kenneth Wilson; Brett Trotter; Franklin Chancey; Eileen Parrish; Bryan Hoss; Judge Carroll Ross; Judge Amy Reedy; Doctor James Sego; Alvin Paschal; Steve Bebb, District Attorney General; 10° Judicial | Drug Task Force; Bradley County District Attorney General’s Office: Bradley Coun| . ty Sheriffs Office; Pamela Hancock; and William Hammack. Ill. RULE 29.6 | Pursuant to Rule 29.6 of this Court’s Rule, Petitioner, Mario D. Jones, inherited 900 shares of the Class “C” common stocks of Norvin M. Wilson Incorporation. if