No. 21-7400

Derrick U. Stricklin v. Nebraska

Lower Court: Nebraska
Docketed: 2022-03-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: alibi-evidence capital-case capital-punishment criminal-procedure fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment trial-tactics
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the failure of defense counsel to file a notice of alibi and present ample alibi evidence when instructed to do so by the defendant in a capital case, to investigate other known suspects, and to consult with an expert regarding cell phone tower location evidence, renders counsel constitutionally ineffective within the meaning of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW | I. WHETHER THE FAILURE OF DEFENSE COUNSEL TO FILE A NOTICE OF ALIBI AND PRESENT AMPLE ALIBI EVIDENCE WHEN INSTRUCTED TO DO SO BY THE DEFENDANT IN A CAPITAL CASE, TO INVESTIGATE OTHER KNOWN SUSPECTS, AND TO CONSULT WITH AN EXPERT REGARDING CELL PHONE TOWER LOCATION EVIDENCE, RENDERS COUNSEL CONSTITUTIONALLY INEFFECTIVE WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SIXTH AND | FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS? JI. WHETHER THE EXCUSE OF “TRIAL TACTICS” MAY BE USED TO AVOID CONSTITUTIONAL SCRUTINY OF DEFENSE COUNSEL'S PERFORMANCE IN A CAPITAL CASE WHERE SUCH TRIAL TACTICS ARE FOREDOOMED TO FAILURE? | | -i ee |

Docket Entries

2022-05-23
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2022)

Attorneys

Derrick U. Stricklin
Derrick U. Stricklin — Petitioner
Derrick U. Stricklin — Petitioner