No. 21-7407

Janece Tisdel v. The Witness Protection

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure constitutional-law federal-jurisdiction government-disability legal-jurisdiction mandamus standing state-court subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2022-05-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the United States Court of Appeals and the United States District Court have subject matter jurisdiction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DOES THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AND THE UNVTED STATES DISTRICT COURT HAVE GUBTECT MATIER JURISDICTION? SINCE A PERSON 1s SUING A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM Ab FILED FOR MANDAMUS , THE MATTERS OF. wiict BELONG TO THE US, DisTRICT COURT. |

Docket Entries

2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent The Witness Protection to respond filed.
Main Document
2022-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Janece Tisdel
Janece Tisdel — Petitioner
Janece Tisdel — Petitioner
The Witness Protection
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent