Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated when the trial court failed to appoint counsel, denied formal complaints, and dismissed the case without addressing the petitioner's objections

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED PETITIONER AS|ts. To PRESERVE ALL RIGHTS... MoTIONS Fed KPPointMS Ist OF CounseL Any oR AL ARGUMENT? FENIONER, materin PoBiniguys (5 Wks SEY InWFA| Sona AND RERMANETLY DISMELED Sine Jury jo,200F, Paeseavé pry AReumdrTs THAT | PoReET TD MALE, Th. TAInL Cotr US, DN.) Zocvol33o FAILED TD AfPomT CornsétL. wry DW 2066 SoleMops OLIVER Snr, Dismiss DU& Td 2ZUSCIISAZ WHY Was MY FORMAL CoMPLAlnT LENDKED AGMINST Hi ey AWD NOP ANDeSsoo RA US Laer er AMParLs Loree’ Wit? WAS Sueecme lokr of ato Di Sefunaey CaW5SEL amir Cex 2 WS THERS UNDER SG PROSECUTE AL MiSeoNDOCT, JunicéAL PP PORL CnbRops 21 301% T Atmsc oP Picea Cet ony ICR GATIIB-A) TeRGIAO'-n LAUL & OY ERS oH THE GM ane, ERACRED BT NOT AfPor STING CONSEL. OR HoLD ORAL Rkoumpur Zi~ 3014. THEY Moka BY DiSmissinG Mov: ol, 2221 ang DENYING Retkking DEC o6,202/, Lemme BIAS. MY REPERED oBSecne ns Tr CY Atob Cawmty Kos eurn's OLE REPRE SOMTING DEF rs /mPrELUEES WH) Nor ADORESSO> Aros LGhpRED. IT 1S & CLEAR Crcr, Pomnose 1S BEING TREO UNGaAly Bechesé HE LS IncarR camo Whee 1S DpsCRiannGPr> plo bEatse & (tH Unley }e5. Why was py Righty Dub Process DENEDS WHY Was Fokmal Corre ine KERMIT CR oui duoe€s Aor AYDRESSED Ap WA LON TASTSS WiY Way TEE onSE MOT HERD on ITS merits’ © fou. DewrEN fad 8G DBPL | Que Mons PReseniren | WHY Ufes 1 PULLEds ovER/ STVPFED ¢ PROFILED ¢ THE CAR i WAS PRIVING ;NME of DAY. SHouly | HAVE BEEN ARRESTED ON OCT: 31,2017? BY Pouce ones, h PoLicel DBP, A City OPERATING CUT of ITS’ JURISDICTION , CUTSIDE OF ITS ry LMS, way was 1 Darauyea? Wily WAS | Ageesten? way, Because pe my [Disaa ries” AS My VEICLE AlLowED Jo BE UNipweLY PRRCUS DS Wi \ytS ay VERE ThWED? Uw Awhubly , SUPERYI SAS Liag ue | Toke Weng ON Dury. wu pits Nows BVA. Helo Accounrnaré 2 _pstkinra soa | WHY Wes 1s “CAS” moweD Fo Mocesp 2 wir URINE, Boon, OR BR ERTHKALIZER ¢ why wars My DAvORS LENSE SusPenDsen Pty MINE STRATIVELY Fo RE NTS Wile Due PoESS? wey Did | an. » fay APPL Son Fa, AS Sohne ment? WHY DID | ve “1d Pry ure menl Twin 4 Ad Powe FEES? way Was | Aba) GuSELY ap esom Oy pROKLD on PoLiCe AND “Tawen Bwo Fionn bg tage Po isfl& AS A& REST of THs FALsS apmin ATs SSA Sol | pd Didn ' TRE JudGe Ar THE [itl Al lotr Pleo pced — rab Loi Rlekr TH iy KignAteina 7 Cigar DS wlohe f MS Pe eSumey Cui TOAD OF INV bCONT LS TIL PR i Wty WAS UY ater Conicy I7eR 22, Ind CTMaIT Awo Orbs SLL MOO Ty (ROCEED 2 | Nok MM Arpengy wad Ack Geen dufy _PRoUPEDIgG wy? wily WAS A Cem AL CASE BULB ‘do fheoef60 4 | POOH UV L MIUSconnuct, MUS ofwituey 2 wity wat THE | TRanffnot WW Bony) Mancy | PAip aby Recuanifo T2 MS? sei puns Linu is. ate aut Late Belt, —_ Dic MONTY of Porand% USES Wabreeyr Pscear¢ ? Swit Jt Me HSL on APRIL NN Zool fl? AS ScequLeD SNUG Mel Uap 7, WEY wasn a Tety HOR une fbeLd on | Phat DEA. MoT ty SURES ALES MARCH 13,916 Apr Moke Wit ML sm pl colTiVED Cuspon? From DOS MALY AES Booher AW Juovciah Migcaaucr , PLIce Miscomoncr, WHY Has My GUN Not fSen Rerutn@Dd? of fs meu2sEr_ Why} Have -) Nog BSBN AKONE Rate OS wy Ire TUES false oN aASEN PuincG@eh? | VID | Ane Do | Conte TO SuGGee FRoM nasa UUEnEnEESED I NT KEM NT NU L_ MADE Saws, Mos € cok ALL 6 THs St baGumiaves Al Reapy lsc pm £6 [Enoaen? _ NEY ae Pen! He oan) IN ATTOCNE 5 ACPO 2, yy bees 'f PAID ATroA wes _ Pete ON Ma GeltALe 2 CrpRUY lat’? an we Uepvew't | Been) Be lLemréo , P2806 RES Reo PAneeecy Aesneten 2 | Apa) A Poli CAL Parse yee? IF So Wh | AUPeWPreD Tikes, ofbee PST Mods “TD MhIS Coax Ow Hr “THEY _ASSiowen A Now? was Ta Chime [oak Cais | Ghouwitr iA ASTRLUM oy pF eth AS Or LillLevolboF % WHY HAVEN'T MY FAMILY Aw ME Been eFerep WITNESS Peorection ¢