No. 21-7421

Linda Jolly v. Carmelita White, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-procedure civil-rights disclosure disclosure-laws due-process federal-government federal-law no-fear-act retaliation whistleblower whistleblower-protection
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why did the United States Federal Government allow Federal UNAX Law (IRM 10.5.5) and Retaliation Laws to be broken through the 'No Fear Act?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Why did the United States Federal Government allow Federal UNAX Law (IRM 10.5.5) and Retaliation Laws to be broken through the “No Fear Act”? Why was I treated as though I have done something and I did “nothing wrong”? Why did the U.S. Federal Government did not Protect me through the Disclosure Federal Laws (IRM 25.15.1.9.2, IRM 4.19.10.3) and Whistleblowers Laws (IRM . 25.2.1) and no award given to me? No criminal Penalties Were Enforced by United States Federal Government, (IRM 11.3.16) even though, Carmelita White was not sent by the United States Federal Government and she had recruited outsiders to help harass and steal money from my Bi-Weekly Pay and my Thrift Savings and their actions were covered up. , |

Docket Entries

2022-07-14
Case considered closed.
2022-05-23
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 13, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2021-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 20, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Linda Jolly
Linda Jolly — Petitioner
White, Carmelita
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent