No. 21-7422

Edward Shane West-El v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-21
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access delegated-authority due-process government-authority in-forma-pauperis judicial-review standing tax
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where does Charles P. Rettig and his employee's that are on his staff get the Delegated Authority to question the Plaintiff Edward Shane WestEl regarding anything

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented | 1.Where does Charles P. Rettig and his employee’s that are on his staff get the Delegated Authority to question the Plaintiff Edward Shane WestEl regarding anything. 2. My second question is, Did the United States District Court’s Employee Beth Bloom take an oath to Uphold the Constitution of the United States Republic of North America? And if so, why is Beth Bloom hindering my | exercise of a Constitutional Right? And that Right is access to the United State’s Courts. I filed an Affidavit of Financial Statement in the Lower not tribunals; and the Affidavit says plaintiff doeshave or possess “ any gold or silver coins.” 3. Also, why is Beth Bloom still requesting that I pay the filing fee for the pending appeal, and Beth Bloom also stated in her Order that “Furthermore, the Court directs Plaintiff to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 (a) (5), which states that, upon a district court’s denial of an in i forma pauperis motion, “a party may file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the court of Appeals within 30 days after service of the notice | | prescribed in Rule 24 (a) (4),” | | 4. Why did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit deny the | Plaintiff’s Affidavit of Financial Statement. 5. Where is Beth’s Bloom proof of her Delegation of Authority Order? , 6. Where is Kevin C. Newsom’s proof of his Delegation of Authority Order? , ii

Docket Entries

2022-05-23
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2022-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent Internal Revenue Service, et al. to respond filed.
2022-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 20, 2022)

Attorneys

Edward Shane West-El
Edward Shane West-El — Petitioner
Edward Shane West-El — Petitioner
Internal Revenue Service, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent