Whether the U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals erred in finding plaintiff failed to state a claim regarding encroachment upon plaintiff's constitutional protected freedom of association

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , | L WHETHER THE US. DISTRICT COURT AND U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN FINDING PLAINTIFF FAILED TO STATE A CLAIM REGARDING ENCROACHMENT UPON PLAINTIFF'S CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTED ; FREEDOM OF ASSOACTION? IL | WHETHER PETITIONER MET THE Turner v. Safely, (1987) 482 U.S. 78, 96 L.Ed. 2d 64, 107 S.Ct. 2254 8 I. WHETHER HEARING PLAINTIFF'S EX POST FACTO LAW VIOLATION CLAIM WARRANTED TO PREVENT A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE? 0... ccscscsseseeseseel 7 IV. WHETHER THE US. DISTRICT COURT AND THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE HECK BAR APPLIES TO A VOID JUDGMENT, AGAGINST TRESPASSERS OF OF LAW, AND ACCOMPLISHED THAT BY “AVOIDING ANSWERING MOTION TO IMPEACH THE VOID JUDGMENT? V. WHETHER THE U.S. THE DISTRICT COURT AND U.S. COURT OF APPEALS | ERRED IN FINDING PETITIONERS' SLANDER/DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER CLAIM DOESN'T MEET THE ANCILLARY JURISDICTION STANDARD? VL WHETHER THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND U.S. COURT RULED IN ERROR OF WELL-SETTLED LAW THAT STATE OFFICIAL SUED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY SHOW UP TO COURT AS INDIVIDUALS PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 1983? ..scsccee-36 | | j