No. 21-7438
Tramone Horne v. United States
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-discretion judicial-review preponderance-of-evidence sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Court require proof by more than a preponderance of the evidence of facts that significantly increase the defendant's sentence range under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Should the Court require proof by more than a preponderance of the evidence of facts that significantly increase the defendant’s sentence range under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines? i STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Tramone Horne
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent