Norman Alan Kerr v. Christopher Gomez, Warden
Whether the stipulation waives all the elements of the offense, and whether the court can legally hold such a stipulation as valid
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Sho to Vilidete the Valotstany, aro Krsousing ly Recui site of hpoletow thd waives alt He elements of te ofPense ; Require the defers dest to persoioally aqree its Open Court, Before cy Tried Coot anton Any Collateral! TR bv wal ) legally hold tact sacl stipelebion as Valid, whether. preseeved on foot (2) Should a Worth, Careline athe mairdeded. vvtlen, a Gen , tea IS A-tstd,l (b aul ( C eid 5 [5 A= RYO, (4 tht oe the ieRodeal “I 4% math, minomom aul a [0 norte Maximo » Constitole possible senteavce Constaved to mect the. Yeo aul w deo Requinemeist ) token caleola ting the then, the Aches Acct LOS GYRE of o Felony stetos for. the PURpose, oh & TAL) comviction . ee (3) does Rebate US, 139 5.cT, UAI (201g) amovuT te, a sebstaosive Liofer versie, Shaw, iy Law for the. pURpdSe, ‘ a 2US8 (e) AVIINGTS Ceo, Is & 4 224|( pdtiod , Whew the, 4 cute. of Coowchi on Pen Cente Knrouisted, te ow Ahete modeted. Seno hence. to aq ferm ot Tagnisounet for. less tha Oe Yea ap o dar, (4) Does & gortnmnent, Liven Concerning He Pull con heats of ty Mpvletion Gmovidt to Wel ving the. Stipolation) It tel Hi i Ruled by the Cour, All onsed the Angp meat fo pio ceo Ni ia I Tiel a felon , Eve though the. Stipoletion) _ CAUSE AT ANS RUC. Stebed di 5 Mn. Ce De % by the, “LRedok: PAT OBES CR 0 ajneed.