whether-the-federal-district-court-erred-in-dismissing-the-case

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Id why Ae wily Ted STATES DisTucl covyl #o7r the DisTr/eT~ ah Pvevia RI@ have nor head The fiules GF Pe mas ENGIN ano spawish P a) why The feferz/ P19 Typo) cov WA iT more Thaw ave year tor Fuad AWS WE 2— 0 mine Law 07, PhS shoT be dete! 3 zr WAS Me The coyr7 Wy/// Declay-e. We |v dete OfT aNe Ba VNIeV LY VE 57 far defealT, QT NeTRIVGT haters TO Femme poy Move haw afle year OP NET ANS werItTZ MIME eM Pla | Law s0iT IWhy iS tema Oley The Law? a) d the Rules 6A Reriarw The Ayyendy cand 2 Do MoT sAy Thal © fitlle she Right 1 Apeal ave Law 50/7" ke — ofoy wrong dei 19 2we PrSCVS MiNaTIOM| , Jay Edgardd Anelatace Ares, chive We PoevTO Rice, 2 second CESS ZiTizeds BUT eT Por the Ay prre5)