No. 21-7443

Roberto Arenas-Tellez v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure district-court guideline-range holguin-hernandez-v-united-states judicial-discretion sentencing-guidelines substantial-arguments
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, after Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, _U.S.__, 140 S.Ct. 762 (2020), a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range, even if the party had not lodged a specific objection to the court’s failure to do so? Whether a district court errs should reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range? i

Docket Entries

2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Roberto Arenas-Tellez
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent