When should a court consider a defendant's post-sentencing rehabilitation

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ® Can the Supreme Court please clan Ey as heiding in Roper ve US, Nor v.s, 577 (doit) as te when 4% Court Shi id ov shovid not have to consider a defendants postsedtencin Cehabs|.taty on P? Did the lower Courts err when they reCused iy) Consider the ° peritioners Complete transformation and perseng | achievements | vabetween bis two Sentencings © Why woul d any) Covvt evyey not want +e consider positive changes an individga | made Since his of gina | Sentencing e Can a Cort relly Jest look OVTV the origin | Sentencing transcn pts and then resentence th.+ Person (tom his desk ° 9 When does the Supreme Court exercise its * supervisoy power” Pyrsvan}t +o Supreme Court Role. lO (4) Pr Hos much rl 4 le Q lower Court et away vith ? When iS €nooa h enes ke Wt This Cort be a safeguard AGuest nyostiee PO! _ ° ‘ Why, does 4 Covet not Lave 4, expressly decide evens legihinate arasment on the merits °C Why, oe they not anKe an “ene Sef Bra oments Serious i \s Shing that * They have considedd the | Cemaining arguments and Crd then +o be wsrthe t ment” at the end of an order ; withot “ony Rkp \anation , ves Hy Su ictent ° Why dees the * sent of the law and the lethey of the Vw always seen, to be in con het and NEVEY in AW Cement with each other © Why de The principles of estice and Cirness net apply to most ereenary people © Nill the Supceme Court ever take steps ars end mass Incarceration C Can we reduce the American prison pops l4 tion + vader a milhon people °