Does an incarcerated individual have the timely and speedy right to an attorney before important court decisions are made, such as missing a deadline for an appeal?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED _ ; 1. Does an incarcerated individual have the timely. and’ ‘ speedy right to an attorney before important court | decisions are made, such missing a deadline~for an Appeal? : | a . | . a“ / 2. Whether the Court of Appeals properly relied on Bowels | v. Russell appropriately since-the Petitioner did not have : : ./ timely and speedy access to an attorney while incarcerated, given the fact that incarcerated individuals, /such as the Petitioner does not have full and free access‘ to legal representation? : 3.Should the Court of Appeals have made an exception to 28 | U.S.C. § 2107(b)(2)7 Fed. R. App. P. 4(af(1)(B) (ii) because } the Petitioner did not have access to his attorney to : | appropriately make decisions to go to trial to refute false | and misleading statements made by witnesses? . ; . | | . | : | ' ~~ OO .