1. Does an incarcerated individual have the timely- and speedy right to an attorney before important court decisions are made, such missing a deadline^for an Appeal?

2. Whether the Court of Appeals properly relied oh Bowels v. Russell appropriately since^the Petitioner dtcf not have timely and speedy access to an attorney while incarcerated, given the fact that incarcerated individuals, /such as the Petitioner does not have full and free access' 7to legal representation?\

3. Should the Court of Appeals have made an exception to 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 4 (aO" (1) (B) (ii) because the Petitioner did not have access to his attorney to appropriately make decisions to go to trial to refute false and misleading statements made by witnesses?

Does an incarcerated individual have the timely and speedy right to an attorney before important court decisions are made, such as missing a deadline for an appeal?