Did the district court and the United States Court of Appeals fail to consider Petitioner's opposition to Respondent's cross-motion for summary judgment?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the districh court and the united States. Court OF Appeals fail +o ConSider Petitioner Opposition “0 FeGpondent CCO8SMotion For Summary Sudamen}'r Was peyrhoners Opposition sto TeSxondont CrOS§Motion ~For Summary Ouggmenr cons: Sten+ With he Law undec Fed. & civ. P, BOSO'Y. 40 Support hiS Verified Complaint GS evidence in this matter e Did the District Coury and the united States court OF appealS -Fai)-+o ‘honestly caw Ceview tho Video Cecordigas in 4hiS mater under the Lawe Was the OiStrich Court required +o appoint. petitioner Counsel Upon his reques* that he Was proceeding Pro SE, and that AhiS Ontire USe GF force inci deny Was Captured on Vi d00, FOCOTAINGS WIC he Could Nok Provide | himSell ocho courthe } Did the Oistrick court Gnd the United Grates Court GF appeals put peditioners Safety in danger by Not addressing hiS opposition to FeSpondent C FOSS Moti0N stor Summary Ougamren+ being thay this entire incidamt OF She | Du gust G,Q049 vse of force Against pHitioner (waS Caphuced On Video Cecordinos is