No. 21-7470
Reggie Orlando Williams v. Texas
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment judicial-charging legal-procedure margin-of-error state-court state-prosecution
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When the State of Texas failed to elect which charging transaction of the offense the State was going to have Petitioner convicted under, did this result in a violation of Double Jeopardy as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED When Whe Slate o€ ~rexas failed 4s elect Which Charging Sronsackon of he offence Ane _ ° Stale was gang Xo \nave. Pekoner Conviced ude Doves Mne Some cesuth Mn a Violation a€ Oouble | Seepordy as guaranteed by The Fil Amerdnak of The US. Constlation. | Pelion For Wik OF Carkiocan| gage \ . t |
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2022)