Earnest Eugene Walker, Jr. v. Kansas
Whether the SHtuce ESA QQ-S50y Coetection of Sentence avid AS fAe Samer SKe fobeasr your to be Consteuec ns Ye Same fo Coegecf aN ZV hegal Sedfev ce Affe Sedtetcaed hes been Seeved 3 ifhewd & masrfesf/»j wwHice Dos ocengted Hhat Was wot Fixed duerris Hee ime fhe Sedbevee Was Hetiger
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The Nypellist is questioning the SHtuce ESA QQ-S50y Coetection of Sentence avid AS fAe Samer SKe fobeasr your to be Consteuec ns Ye Same fo Coegecf aN ZV hegal Sedfev ce Affe Sedtetcaed hes been Seeved 3 ifhewd & masrfesf/»j wwHice Dos ocengted Hhat Was wot Fixed duerris Hee ime fhe Sedbevee Was Hetiger, This me on fhe kecagd awd fais shols on) fact Av Potitiodew Was violated by /§ UST 272, due Pre cess Clouse avd fhe [ft A-meid mest Was Vie Late [Depeivig, Phe bagkts oF the Patitroata) hawse) = Fave pod impaohel Tedgmert.) Se PleGer vi OKhheme , 140 S.C+ 24992 (2 90). Jester Goasuch | Wertns fre ta najoed) 3teteid : “Un li rte | Acts, (eefoemed Cong, Clough ava luitr sufhiciedt Vigo » bake Neyer Shona to amewel fhe (nur. Zo ho ld often wis? Lfould be to elevate Ske Poo F| b eaten) awd fonigstondi') jdyes tice ovenk7 he Jar), bo vA Revipedinie O/teng And Paleo Prose iS Fhe hight. ZA ot QHYXR, bE fea Leview ing al fa Yoems fog, & motion Kaa Tlege-| Sentence’ ‘ fheww is Ne peopees fren DS fhe 4b Couet eo Conmcth Ay Sentence artes tt has been) Saved (Jhew tre C&SeL Should have been Lemanded backs fo fu KANSAS Sheed Cougd’ to pule od fhe matter. [i/ hither, Sertenir We illeger! eo