HO (Jhl lkl$ (fa* COU&fUod Ojfyfa fn\3ooS- Cotitel
fa ) X, JPe /M hts f0s#l To yf)E OrM
(sffflBS Dlsjticr CouPT) TPP ri° 0/9&&V&D
jge, ftLLouJeS 'pb pfoc&eD boftfa Us p&defifiL pf)pftS
Cofcf06 OP &OOS F%P Pupppsa OP fjrrdcp]r^ jU
bELLegflilffiY Op A/G CorWkX^bN / &o7OOfts ProcjZ&uftJplX
QpfPk^ pop Pft}l}tteA tb frttzp A/s oM& Y^fp UfttblMs
jkf 60hfch ~tb pTt&'fiS fafujfi&d 6Y LPhAx fepipOM^P
fftOC- PefiSOMS ip(oahiA l*)'s COAitfol PS /S ftLL%o
(?c£ /pOfZdkft Pb Qc. ftLLPOeFp T& C-j&Mpi Ww fcf iYidM&p fftip- cookr ft- Colo ftp l>l shcio}^
OP A/s C-^PP pis js ftLU o p&a*(jft Sed 7a/
T5 ftftocS ft /nF6C/Ylpfafe oF^buSp/c^
CoM&T/T uT/ O PftfL UfOlftT/oA^' , feptfiOMeP
(Ji9S JtLej^ftiOi /$Ai4 OOpo^puty Cort\jfanU> 6Y
7^& ^TPr^tJ\/ouJ yeft/^S L ft 70ft A//9^ ft/SQJScS
OF ft X/'iSrlpuT}oM/yi y(oLftftO>^ OF /ft 'S.Tftfe
frtsoM, Q)0t oMPy To pj/H.cL c>uT jft/ftr P&nrh/tyi
ftpd /V0 > \Jtokftftsd. FP/OST i'H~sTt<c>MfFL ftul&g
kjhtof) (ft ft ft As ft hU to p)/SS ~J~U^ fte/n/yfAuP^
M\s Aa hftp Up- tF (Pt'u 7ImeLy, chftU eS
IftOS USPiP&d Cpfo/ucfed (Okioft P'ftTffioHeA
LojU f/ue yk/s c0opr priorc derwps on.SuF
(fthft kjfts ptTi T> OHeJl f)PPit tLt(5{Vt/ '5Se

Whether the petitioner should be allowed to proceed with his federal habeas corpus petition to challenge the alleged illegality of his conviction, despite procedural bars for filing it one year late