No. 21-7484

Hayze L. Schoonover v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2022-03-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: courtroom-closure defendant-rights media-access overriding-interest public-trial sixth-amendment substantial-reason waller-test
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether allowing the media to remain in the courtroom preserves a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a public trial during a partial courtroom closure

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Whether allowing the media to remain in the courtroom preserves a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a public trial during a partial courtroom closure where the defendant’s family members and the general public are barred from attending the proceedings. (2) Whether the “overriding interest” test established by this Court in Waller v. Georgia, 467 U.S. 39 (1984) or the “substantial reason” test, that has been adopted by a majority of jurisdictions, should be used to determine if a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a public trial has been violated by a partial courtroom closure. i

Docket Entries

2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent llinois to respond filed.
2022-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Hayze L. Schoonover
Thomas Anthony KaralisOffice of the State Appellate Defender, Petitioner
llinois
Katherine Marie DoerschOffice of the Illinois Attorney General, Respondent