Did Gam E cE | ~ NoTKE expose the plaintiff to dangerous living conditions by his reluctance and insubordination to wear his mask appropriately?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED “ DID Gam E cE | ~ NoTKE EXPOSE THE PLAINTIFF To DANGEROUS LIVIN. CONDITIONS By HIS RELUCTANCE Ad INSUBORDINATION To WEAR HIS MARK APPROPRIATELY 2 (LS WELL ke MULTIPLE DEFEMGANTS). 2. DID C.C.T. NoTHE ABUSE. HIS OFFICIAL POWERS By FALSELY WRITING A, DISCUPLINARY REPORT AGAINST THE PAAINTIFF FoR VERBALLY EXPRESS~ ING DISAPPROVAL OF C-C.TNOTHES (SUBORDINATION 76 WEAR HIS FACE. MASK AMONGST THE IRMATES DURING THE HEIGHT OF THE PASDEM2 (igo RETALIATED IN COLLUSION AGAINST PLAINTIFF TB MAKE PAROLE AUGUST 30,2021). 3. pid LT LEE peopeRL{ EXECUTE PROCEDURKLLY THE GRIEVANCE OF THE IWARTE. ADAINGT C-C.T) MOTHE BY HIS RELUCTANCE To WEAR A MASK ; AMoNGee THE INKTES? a pip Lu ZEE VIOLATE PROCEDURE BY PLAUNG THE PLAINTIFF (NTO RESTRICTIVE HOUSING UNIT AND ATTENDANCE To HIS STAI? searcrs ¢ 5. AFTER. CONMDERIKG, TRE PLANITIFF INDIGENT DID THE CouRT VIOLATE (TS pIscRETION By SEEKING A PAYMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFE (SUPREME. COURT) JANUARY TY 202 1 THE PLAINTIER NOT BEING Ass ATTORNEY IMSELE NAS DENIED ASSIS TANCE OF AN KCTORNEM, WEN rr WAS OBNIOUS HE COULD NoT PRESENT HIS CLAIM APPROPRIATELY « DID “THE, APPEAL COURT VIOLATE THE 14 AMENDMENT 64 DENY’ ino THE PLUNTIFE EQUAL PROTECTIONS OF THE AAW 1 ARE. STETE. AeTOMS EXEMPT FROM GROSS NELLIGENCE AND MALICIOUS [NTENT DaaIde THE PANDEMIC? 9. pie STATE Attors PEN THe PETTTIONER THE RIGHT NOt TO BE EXPOSED ct CRUEL. ARS UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT VIOLATING HE EIGHTH AMENDMENT ~ “Heovel DELIBERATE (NDIFFERENCE2 a Dib APPEAL COWRT’ APPROPRIATELY COMIDER EVIBENCE PRESENTED> “To teevere ho. BiRO-CV4UBI (SRA) JULY G, 2020 ~ OCTCGER B 2020 By Wher [Pentiad| summary sunemenT ZED COURT To DISMISS THE CLAIM % tpi HE SUPREME Coutts DENIAL OF [PARTIAL] SUMMARY SUBGMEDST [MFOSE A Hans ON THE PLAINTIFF AFTER PLAINTIFF Disetoseb EVIDENCE To hotkeT 3:Z0CV631 ¢ tle pip APPEAL CoukTs DENTAL OF OCTOBER 13,2021 Disctostb EvIbENCE 6F WARDEN OK THE DISTRICT NICK RODRIGUEZ DENIAL TO UPHOLD bisciPLIWARY REMRT OF LT. LEE JU 23,2020 CURTAIL THE PLAINTIFFS ABWLITY c m Dupce eave INPOSED INDIGENT INKATE PAY A FitrnG eee ee HE. ie Re LAN? CLAIM. AP CER. IN FEMA PAUPERL IMBOSED 3120-EV-G3) (ce) AND 3.2t-tv-1 78% (aru) TES