No. 21-7486
Eric Jamar Goodall v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-appeal illegal-sentence jurisdictional-defect ninth-circuit plea-agreement sentencing-error waiver waiver-doctrine
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit err in dismissing the appeal when Mr. Goodall's plea agreement contains a count of conviction and resulting sentence that is no longer a crime, and an illegal sentence is a jurisdictional defect that is not waivable?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did the Ninth Circuit err in dismissing the appeal when Mr. Goodall’s plea agreement contains a count of conviction and resulting sentence that is no longer a crime, and an illegal sentence is a jurisdictional defect that is not waivable? i
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Eric Jamar Goodall
Angela Helen Dows — Cory Reade Dows & Shafer, Petitioner
Angela Helen Dows — Cory Reade Dows & Shafer, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent