No. 21-7487
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure discovery district-court-order evidentiary-ruling harmless-error motion-to-suppress suppression-hearing trial-witness-list witness-disclosure witness-testimony
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner is entitled to a new trial based on the district court's order denying his motion to suppress
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether petitioner is entitled to a new trial based on the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Whether petitioner is entitled to a new trial based on the district court’s erroneous determination permitting a detective to testify despite not being listed on the government’s trial witness list.
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)
Attorneys
Dion Fisher
Matthew P. Farmer — Farmer & Fitzgerald, Petitioner
Matthew P. Farmer — Farmer & Fitzgerald, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent