No. 21-7492

In Re Jonathan Manwell

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-03-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review confrontation constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure discovery due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel forensic-evidence impartial-tribunal
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does petitioner have a constitutional right to located and confirmed exculpatory forensic evidence, transcripts, and documents necessary for a meaningful opportunity to present a complete and adequate defense and an adequate and effective appeal, especially where he was deprived of his constitutional right to an impartial tribunal, counsel of choice, confrontation, and effective assistance of counsel throughout both his trial and appellate proceedings?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | | TZ. Does PEMMTIONER HAVE A COASTITUMONAL RIGHT Jo | LOCATED AND CONFIRMED EXCULPATORY FOREUISIC | FEVIDERCE , TRANSCRIPTS AND Docume sis NECESSARY FOR A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY 7 PRESET A ComPLETE AND ADEQvATE DEFENSE AWD AN ADEQuaTe AWD EFFECTWE APPEAL. Spec ALLY WHERE HE WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS ConisTiTUTIONAL RIGHT Fo AW IMPARTIAL TRIBONAL, CouNsél oF CHOCE, Cont FRoVTATION , AnD EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF Counsel THRoGHout Bot oF Ais FRAC AND APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS. | . Retitoner aaswels, “Yes i”

Docket Entries

2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-02-17
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Jonathan Manwell
Jonathan Manwell — Petitioner