Did the lower court err or abuse its discretion when granting summary judgment or dismissal before discovery was implemented, and based upon medical records never authenticated, and without defendants being ordered to provide medical records

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I. DID THE LOWER COURT ERR OR ABUSE ITS DISCRETION ‘ WHEN GRANTING SUMMARY ‘JUDGEMENT OR DISMISSAL BEFORE DISCOVERY WAS IMPLEMENTED, AND BASED UPON MEDICAL RECORDS NEVER AUTHENTICATED, AND WITHOUT DEFENDANTS BEING ORDERED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL “RECORDS FROM THE OUTSIDE DOCTOR//SPECIALIST . THAT ADVISED PLAINTIFF THE DOCTOR WOULD ORDER TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY? II. DID ALL THE COURTS ERR WHEN FAILING To CONSIDER THE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIBILITIES OF PROVIDING ' CONSTITUTIONAL MINIMUMS OF MEDICAL TREATMENT, ‘ AND CONSIDER THE PAIN AND SUFFERING APPELLANT | . ENDURED AND CONTINUES TO ENDURE, BASED ON THE | DEFENDANT'S. PECUNIARY INTERESTS ? III. HOW WOULD DEFENDANT'S DESERVE SUMMARY JKUDGEMENT OR DISMISSAL, AFTER WATCHING PLAINTIFF SUFFER . FOR 15 YEARS BECAUSE OF DELIBERATE MEDICAL . INDIFFERENCE TO HIS SERIOUS MEDICAL NEEDS. | | | | | | SE | . ; |