No. 21-7506

Curtis Carr v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2022-03-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility fair-trial fifth-amendment interrogation interrogation-techniques videotaped-evidence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the admissibility of videotaped interrogations in which the interrogating officers inject their conclusions about the suspect's guilt violate the defendant's Fourteenth Amendment due process right to a fair trial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Question Pose rsteL Does the actmissibility oF videotaped! jeter if agations is which the interrogating oNicers jwsect theic coochisions about the oSeratyts guilt violate cc deerclapts Uviled Sfates Constitdion Anenocltnent XV me process oS haw rights do a Sai trial ? j , VA parties appear Iv the Captioss of the Casé ow the Cover page. 2 | Lp The | . Supteme Court OF The Coiled! States Rito) For WeitoF Cectioraci Chiriors Bebw The opiniod K the Appellee Court oF Lilwois, Is Mebrict appeats at Appel A 4o the petition apol is tepoctet af | Reople v. Caer, 2021 TL App, (5%) 19038 7LL “The opinions of the highest State Guct f review the mechs ofpents | at

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2022)

Attorneys

Curtis Carr
Curtis Carr — Petitioner