No. 21-7511
Kevin E. Herriott v. Charles Burton, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the South Carolina appellate court's ruling is constitutional and reasonable in content to further a legitimate governmental objective?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED )) WHETHER THE ‘souTH CAROLT WA APPELLATE 7 CoueT RULES ror Ca) C4) Is fhe AWD REA OMBLE _ , . LW CowTEwT To FuRTHER A LEGITIMATE a CovERIMEM TAL OBSECTIVF? |
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent Charles Burton to respond filed.
2022-01-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2022)
2021-12-06
Application (21A203) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 5, 2022.
2021-10-15
Application (21A203) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 7, 2021 to February 5, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Charles Burton
Melody Jane Brown — South Carolina Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Kevin Herriott
Kevin E. Herriott — Petitioner