No. 21-7521
Paul E. Pieczynski v. Pennsylvania, et al.
Relisted (3)IFP
Tags: arbitration arbitration-award civil-action civil-procedure confirmation federal-arbitration-act miscellaneous-filing statutory-interpretation time-bar
Key Terms:
Arbitration Securities
Arbitration Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the petition or motion, when seeking confirmation to confirm a 'time barred' arbitration award, a miscellaneous filing or civil action complaint filing?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The Federal Arbitration Act Title 9 section 12 bars vacating or modifying an award after three months. Is the petition or motion, when seeking confirmation to confirm a “time bared” arbitration award, a miscellaneous filing or civil action complaint filing? . | | | | | | | | | t ' | @ @
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-22
Petitioner complied with order of June 6, 2022.
2022-06-06
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 27, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2022)