Did the court err in considering the argument that the separate interrogatory is an issue of material fact and that the jury had no knowledge of information that the state presented for sentence enhancement?

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED | t) DID THE Court A/ol Consiper. THE. Arner THAT THE SEPERATE G recut) | —— — | INTERROGATORY IS AN ISSUE CF MATELING Frey ANb Thar Te Jury Hap Ne Kxfow LEDGE C1 I FORMATION Tay THE STATE | _—_ Fon SENTENCE MAH hostotces —_— _ | | /as USI 6 THE SEPERATE INTERROCATCR GS? Any Thar Whe SEPERATE INTEFUCOCAT ORY IAS ExXPluines AD DESCRIFE TE | es, — _ x4 ——_ | THE Jury As The ACT? THAT CAUSED THE BCATH 1 — VE Jeezy | Was Met Toly THAT THE SEPERATE INTER ROCAT ER yy kK/As BEING ASIA cir THE ruvRpeR CHareeS Lot A Possiple — vee ( \SENT ENCE INA AN CE MENT . . aq . Z) 1s JHE SHooTIN 6 OF THE GON COASIDGRER THE ACT" Tar Chusé> THE DEATH JF THE VicTing WAS SHer ANw Killes By THE BULLETS oR pRosecrites Whar kieec Fires Frou "A FreeAen 2 3) SHotlin A SEPERATE INTERKOCATORY ConTtRel A VERDICT VWIHEN IM PERTAINS TS AK /SSUE oF MATERIAL FAC prc A Ctiminal CASE AS IT DoES VACA Gil tsa? pee RES SWS BE REERAAIINGS jm C/ 6AT~ OF ThE Fireagy, INHANCEMENT, THE FurteAun AUECATION IS ALIN To SpEciPl INTERRe 6 Ate, ~ AKID JHE SPECIAL INTERRO CAT Ry S Hout, CONTR THE VERDCT~ ~ TST OF PARTIES yal parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. : [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all