Whether the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York erred in dismissing the civil case sua sponte

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented for review in this matter concern a) the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New to dismiss sua , sponte Civil Case No. 20-cv-9161 (LLS), Bralich v. Fox News Network LLC et al, b) the seeming rapid and unjust review of the complaint, c) the mistreatment of pro se efforts and significant successes in spite of marked improvement through meeting the Court’s recommendations, d) the pressing matter of national interest and importance of the matter in question, and e) the unique and novel issue of Civil Rights that is damaging the nation’s integrity, efficiency, and fundamental , structure. This case is currently before the United States Appellate Court for the Second District pending judgment. This petition for a Writ of Certiorari before a judgment in that case has been rendered is tendered as per United States Supreme . Court Rule 11 which provides for such early petition to the Supreme Court in pressing matters of national interest and importance and according to 10(c) the unique and novel issue of Civil Rights that has yet to be judged or legislated and which, as just stated, challenges the nation’s integrity, efficiency, and fundamental ‘ structure. The federal questions were first raised in the initial filing of the complaint of January 29th, 2021, and then in petition for the Writ of Mandamus initially dated February 26+h, 2021. The decision by the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York in the above referenced case is the sole extant judgment being appealed 1 but without a successful appeal of this judgment the pressing matters of national interest and importance will be excluded from adjudication.