Whether the exceptional circumstance of Petitioner being unable to have a federal court review the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process violations warrant this Court exercising its discretionary powers to hear and decide these violations in an original habeas petition

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the exceptional circumstance of Petitioner being unable to have a federal court review the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process violations that were properly preserved in the state trial court simply because his appellate counsel failed to raise them on direct appeal and thus could not raise them in the initial habeas petition filed in federal court warrant this Court exercising its discretionary powers to hear and decide these violations in an original habeas petition in this Court per the holding in Felker v. Turpin 518 U.S. 651 (1996)? 1 PARTIES TO THIS PROCEEDING The Petitioner is Taumu James. The Respondent is Warren Montgomery, Warden. No