No. 21-7544

Erskine D. Salter v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review conflict constitutional-law due-process eleventh-circuit federal-question legal-procedure united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decide a federal question in a way in conflict with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW DID THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECIDE A FEDERAL QUESTION IW A WAY IN CONFLICT WITH THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? : | | . é _ : ! TABLE OF COWTENTS

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2022-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 5, 2022)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Erskine D. Salter
Erskine D. Salter — Petitioner
Erskine D. Salter — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent