4) Is Petiti fao bt bt\v\d n\y\ oafaody fa
fa If USC § H5i } y{OfttC
fast parti'e^or faefa
rds io\fah NmH\ \b Cou/Hofafapptds o\pw preccfan^
&5 wiXI as fa^ -pn^clpitj of"ejjuj\l f>v4id-i\>\nl
Pcfah\v\tr fa kare (k Ctrfarhilofa ofa
apft^IkkiliPy CCOA) issued ; gjvto fab*- parfailator Jtfa~ &fa
$SktJ (tnJ cYtumsfanccs l^rvfatJ and tH\t priYcfafes ofa
profadcfa^Or

*3*) C-&W a Z'fr IASC 5 llOl acfaor fa challenge fake,
h faufaforfatifay of-p>arpo$u 0
I h <k.c toivtn)
fait. sfafadc be bnnA.jhf'o-5
ifUtH] U l/(SC § J3%1 y Or
masfat'h be Co^pUJ u/ifai) j e*y) Z% USC § VLSH
%mn>l

#^) Xs Pe hfai\)C&nS
sfafat afat\Ca 5 (k
(Kofaon f>n Con
HZ Use or)
hr} faHfa/tn ike Wy Uasfa ) -fa A
h&b&as corpus sby-td and Hu habc&S cf^/Vy fa~Up<fa
sfarfai oafa as a. Wofa'vn far d&tbndvfy jad^vncrit
\4rUtr Z% USC § irLOi) franj faced hock fa a mofafdn far
d&cfarafary Judy ivM-nfa and heard or Hie yhcrtfa j £ffa\&rjfa/yo f
afant Or cooptedart Mf t*
oaitU HL IASC §(US } pofenh^fly allowing
fatl hnotince c(a*Yn /V> fac hafatcu ptfakfon 4v prvttici^ Ht at
u

Is petitioner entitled to be found 'in custody' for purposes of 28 USC § 2254, given the particular facts, in accord with Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' own precedent as well as the principles of equal protection