Sloan Patrick Stanley v. Jeffrey Uttecht, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center
Is petitioner entitled to be found 'in custody' for purposes of 28 USC § 2254, given the particular facts, in accord with Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' own precedent as well as the principles of equal protection
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED of.) Ts Petitioner entitted to be found “in custody” hor parpases oF LEUSC § 1154, given the particular fel, tn accords with Ninth Cvew't Court ot Apy cals own precedent | as well as the principles oF equal profection £ ‘2)Ts Potitroner ontitted f have a cerbifitate of | appealability (COA) issued , given the partituler set of Tysuer and civeumsfunees Mvolved and the principles of , 24 ual potectio f 3) Can @ 26 USC §2201 action fo challenge the constr tutional ety of a stofe stoutte he brought as a stand alone action wh conjanchon with 2 USC § 1331, or , must it be Coupled with e.g.) 28 USC § 2154, or 42 USC §/7532 Hf) Is Petitioner entitled in the very least , to have hd haboas corpus petition stayed and the habeas claim that ortyiha L, started oufas a motion for declaratory Judgment under 26 USC § 2201 transfered bock tv a moton fer declorafery Joey meat and heard on the merits , esther stand | alone or coupled with #2 USC $ (993, potentially, allowing | the ac tte! Mnocence claim M the hobeas petitioa to proceed? | l.