Does OCGA § 42-12-8 unconstitutionally prevent equal-access-to-courts

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Preface : The first eight questions were presented to the Georgia Supreme Court in an application for writ of certiorari, which was denied without comment, implying they lack "gravity or great public importance". They are presented again here for this Court's adjudication and opinion of their importance beyond the parties involved, which in turn would answer Question 9. 1. Does OCGA § 42-12-8 unconstitutionally prevent equal access to the courts to a specific group, i.e. incarcerated litigants? 2. IsOCGA § 42-12-8 void for vagueness? 3. Does OCGA § 42-12-8 serve any necessary state interest not otherwise achievable? 4. 1s it fundamentally unfair not to provide inmates with ample warning of the procedural morass of appeal upon notification of a dispositive ruling? 5. Does OCGA § 42-12-8 constructively amend OCGA § 5-6-35 which is contary of Ga. } Const. Article III, Section V, Paragraph TV? 6. Are Rules of the Court fundamentally unfair to incarcerated litigants when the time to respond is lessened by the notification delays of the postal service and the prison | mailroom? 7. Ifan incarcerated litigant has paid out of pocket all filing fees should the State have any interest in the proceedings? 8. Ifthe trial courts don't abide by OCGA § 43-12-6 is enforcement of OCGA § 43-12-8 | precluded? } | 9. Does a challenge to the constitutionality of laws merit consideration in a state court, | irrespective of an article in that state's constitution that allows an arbitrary determination , of ‘public interest’? | | | ii | |