No. 21-7557

Maria Andrea Gonzalez v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-3161 criminal-procedure due-process ends-of-justice federal-district-court findings-of-fact speedy-trial-act statutory-interpretation trial-continuance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Speedy Trial Act require specific findings of fact when excluding days from a criminal defendant's speedy trial clock?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, require federal district courts to make specific findings of fact from those factors enumerated in § 3161(h)(7)(B) where the court relies on one such factor to justify excluding days from a criminal defendant’s 70-day speedy trial clock when granting a continuance of the defendant’s trial based on an ends-of-justice finding under § 3161(h)(7)(A)? i

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2022)

Attorneys

Maria Gonzalez
Stephen R. HormelHormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent