No. 21-7557
Maria Andrea Gonzalez v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-3161 criminal-procedure due-process ends-of-justice federal-district-court findings-of-fact speedy-trial-act statutory-interpretation trial-continuance
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Speedy Trial Act require specific findings of fact when excluding days from a criminal defendant's speedy trial clock?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, require federal district courts to make specific findings of fact from those factors enumerated in § 3161(h)(7)(B) where the court relies on one such factor to justify excluding days from a criminal defendant’s 70-day speedy trial clock when granting a continuance of the defendant’s trial based on an ends-of-justice finding under § 3161(h)(7)(A)? i
Docket Entries
2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2022)
Attorneys
Maria Gonzalez
Stephen R. Hormel — Hormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent