When is a new religious word 190 years old treaty, law, prior ruling, or act of congress automatically retroactive, or does it apply to all cases as it reconfirms old ones?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I WHEN TiS Couthi? MREES A MEW Relig wrod ide -4 190 VEARS OLD TREATY, LAW, PRIOR RULEMG, OL ACT OF COLGRESS ) US JT AUTOMGATICALLY RETROACTIVE , OR DOES IT APPLY 7O ALL CASES AS (7 RECOMFIRIVES OL’ oes ? 2, WHEN A STATE. OFFICER, ACTS UeMDER A STATE Law VIOLATING THE STATES S7RTEKCOS CHARTER , CONST TOTO, FEDERAL LAw, AND Act OF COMGRESS , {S(T Ast ACT OF SED/TIOK , A STATE. SECEDING FROM THE UKPOM OC a STE , OR DOES THAT STATE OFFICER , STRIPPED OF FES . : REPRESS EXTATIVE POWERS , “wARt AGAINST THE : Const Tero , COMMIT AN ACF OF TREASOM AGAINST THE U.S,, Oh DOES 77 BARS Hing LEGAL ST7HHDENG 70 CHALLENGE Me Grar /kupeny ? ) 3. HEM A PERSO FS DETAINED IN A STATE. PRisOK/ . urtTHOUT A VALID ORDER OF COMMITMENT FROM A LAWFUL COURT HAVING TURES DICTION TO DBETATH HM, 1S (TA 2241 we 2254 MATTER ? 4, UItkT (S PROPER REMEDY wHEed CLS. DisTebcrm Cotthr REFUSES TO HEHR CASE WHERE A Geant) JVaRY REECSED FO t(Hd‘CT PETITIONER AND QE YEAR LATER THE Dbis7eicr Arroatexr , PROGECUTED thi AMS OAY, OTHE SAE Eves BACK, FORTHE SAme AcT ?