Whether a new SCOTUS ruling is automatically retroactive and applies to all cases

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED l WHE THES COURT MAKES ANEW RULING wPHOLS bale -A 100 verres oth TREATY, LAU, PRIOR RULEMG,OR Aer OF COCGRESS, "S$ JT AUTOMATICALLY RETROACTIVE, & DOES IT APPLY 70 ALL CASESE AS (7 RECONFIRMES ots ofS ? 2, WHE A STATE. OFRECER , ACTS UMDER A STATE Law VIOLATING THE STATES s7RTEHCOD CHARTER jp CONS TETUTVONL, FEDERAL CAw , AND Act oF ComGRess, I'S iT Atl ACT OF SED/TIOK , A STATE. SECEDNIG FROM THE UPON OF STATE , OR DOES THAT STATE OFFICER , STRIPPED OF HES CONSTITUTION , COMMIT As ACT OF TREASOM AGAINST THE U.S,, Oh DOES G7 BARS HIM LEGAL S7TAHOFNG TO CHALLENGE Me Grar / MRP ? . . 3. WHEN fA PERSO }S DETAINED IN A STATE PRiSOK/ uUsTHOUT A VALID ORDER OF COMMITFMEKNT FROM A LAWFUL COURT HAVIHG TURES DICTION TO DETACH Hit, 1S 1T 48 2241 oR 2254 MATTER ? 4, LIHAT 1S PROPER REMEDY wHeEN U.S. DisTeécm Collkr REFUSES TO HEHR CASE WHERE A Geary VakY REFUSED FO (HdICF PETITIONER AMD QOHE YEAR CATER 7HE DbDisteicr Arroewayv PROSECUTED th' AMY OAY, OXTHE. SATE EVZOENCR FORTHE SAME AcT ? , ° rt :